@SamoBurja You might do. Depends on the relative cost of false positives vs false negatives.
-
-
Replying to @simplic10
@SamoBurja So I have little prob w ppl following heuristic that could be called prejudice when their safety at stake. Threat assessment.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@SamoBurja But in comparing two resumes, say, throw away the damn heuristic bc you will prob overdo it (conf bias) & mistakes are low cost.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@SamoBurja To clarify: mistakes where prejudice would've been right are low cost to you. But mistakes where applicant denied...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@SamoBurja ...bc of prejudice high cost to applicant, esp when iterated over lifetime.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @simplic10
@simplic10@SamoBurja high benefit to next best applicant, esp when iterated over lifetime1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee@SamoBurja Haha true, though marginal benefit of job to already privileged person probably somewhat lower.3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@simplic10 @SamoBurja ...note that this also means others would benefit from the privileged person being hired, by not having to compete...
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.