@tipsfromkatee I think I've fetched all the ingredients now? I'm feeling too lazy to cook them but maybe you see how they'd be cooked.
-
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings if agents are struggling about details of a simulation, why didn't that struggle already get resolved during negotiations3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee oh I dunno. I wouldn't say that the details are more than superficially struggling against each other in this world, even.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings so why does it lend support to the hypothesis that they might be struggling?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee sorry, got lost somewhere. who is hypothetically struggling against whom?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee FWIW I don't think I (strongly) think the gods of this world are fighting each other. idk if that's relevant2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings instead of fighting, read hands-on trading, then1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee right, I think there's no obvious hands-on trading; it's the simplest interpretation in a sense but not overwhelmingly so2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings yet you're saying something more drastic than just "a committee designed the laws of physics", though, right?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee I guess the results don't look like just the laws of physics... how about a committee wrote the play that is this world?2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings i guess all this feels uncomfortably like anthropomorphism (based on superficial appearances, lacking a good understanding)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.