@willdoingthings didn't we meet the preconditions exactly by having the agents not interact?
-
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee by them not being _forced_ to be acted on by each other--key distinction I think1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee once they're all secure there are then opportunities for _only_ Pareto improving interactions1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee so say you want to compute a world but you're only interested in some of the details/parameters...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee ...and there are various free parameters. Well other agents might care about them. Split computation cost.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings i don't have a good picture of this. so a history is being simulated distributed across different locked space bubbles?1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee maybe the simulation isn't distributed but the details of the simulation itself come from a cross-bubble (economic) agreement2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings how do you verify that the other guy is simulating what you want in his walled kingdom? other than that okay.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee There's gotta be ways. I mean, UDT at worst. If not then distributed works okay too.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings okay, let's assume that problem is solved
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.