@tipsfromkatee Right but I see no obvious reason to expect two foomed AIs (say) to be of such substantially different strength
-
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings long time horizons make permanently defeating the enemy more worth paying short-term costs for2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee any reason to (anti-)expect a big offense/defense asymmetry in the limit?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee sorry. superintelligences hit Landauer bound, expanding at light speed, assume no gods to give them favor etc.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings offense one way or the other seems possibly an antiprediction; hard to specify what "status quo continues" even means1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee so, cryptographic asymmetry means it might take more resources to unlock an area of spacetime than to lock it...? idk3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee in which case AIs get to stay in their locked bubbles and the edges of their territories are fixed2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee *mumbles incoherently about black holes*1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@willdoingthings the people who think we're the same person must be so confused right now
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.