@tipsfromkatee yeah. maybe it'd be useful to analyze the psychology of entertainment more... like, the role of media in social epistemology
-
-
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee but then of course if inhuman-like singletons take up most measure "social" epistemology is irrelevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings yes. why would one think they don't take up most measure?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee honestly my answer is psi experiences seem to point towards a complex pantheonic acausal equilibrium. aside from that, none?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings that's an awfully specific thing for them to be pointing to1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee really? I used multiple complex words but I don't think the concept pointed at is burdensomely detailed on the face of it1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings "pantheonic" stands out most1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee sorry, that had unwanted connotations, stupid word choice. I just meant multiple separate, interacting agents...1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings why doesn't the most powerful one optimise the others out of existence? that sort of thing seems burdensome.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee Winner-take-all dynamics like that don't often show up in nature, naively extrapolating from that?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.