ubiquitous ancestor simulations killed the video star
-
-
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee which do you think occupy more human-level-observer measure, historical or entertainment simulations?5 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings historical simulations make sense for a wider variety of different psychologies than entertainment simulations1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee yeah. maybe it'd be useful to analyze the psychology of entertainment more... like, the role of media in social epistemology1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings@tipsfromkatee but then of course if inhuman-like singletons take up most measure "social" epistemology is irrelevant.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @willdoingthings
@willdoingthings yes. why would one think they don't take up most measure?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GapOfGods
@tipsfromkatee honestly my answer is psi experiences seem to point towards a complex pantheonic acausal equilibrium. aside from that, none?4 replies 0 retweets 1 like
@willdoingthings one place to start is: is the present more historically informative, or more narratively compelling?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.