@simplic10 @semiotechnic Yes. You're mistaking abuse of notation for proof. Here P and > are shorthand for looser concepts of likelihood.
@St_Rev @simplic10 @Meaningness @semiotechnic ...whether a thing is true or false, we can use probabilities to reason about uncertainty
-
-
@tipsfromkatee@simplic10@Meaningness@semiotechnic But if you can do probability theory, you already know a ton about a system. -
@St_Rev@simplic10@Meaningness@semiotechnic true if you mean "do probability theory explicitly", not "hold it up as a normative standard" - 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@tipsfromkatee@simplic10@Meaningness@semiotechnic It's the difference btw known unknowns (probability) & unknown unknowns (epistemology)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.