Because there’s a set of copyrights to protect the writers of songs for the lyrics/melody that they've created, you can receive a claim if you sing a song a cappella (regardless of the quality of your vocals--although, tbh, we were impressed). More info: http://goo.gl/ESkbsb
-
-
It's not youtube it's the music industry.
4 replies 1 retweet 82 likes -
Replying to @KlebYT @OmarSebali and
Its youtube supporting the music industry more than creators
3 replies 1 retweet 250 likes -
Replying to @mtz_federico @KlebYT and
By law, YouTube has to cooperate. Copywrite issues are beyond YouTube’s control.
2 replies 1 retweet 91 likes -
Replying to @OmarSebali @disssgraceful and
To do otherwise YouTube will have to go to court over each song claim because the music industry will 100% sue for YouTube not complying. Music industry is the ruthless one.
1 reply 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @GamerZakh @OmarSebali and
But wouldn't youtube win every case like that? 5 seconds of music is fair use, saying the lyrics is fair use
4 replies 0 retweets 16 likes -
Replying to @Winky9622 @GamerZakh and
Of course they would win every time but it’s not worth the thousands of dollars in legal fees for every single case.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @UsernameTqken @Winky9622 and
The thing is that they act music companies would stop being so unfair due they show that they wouldn't allow such thing. But because they don't do shit and give all the revenue to music companies, they are supporting this deplorable act. Therefore they keep claiming videos.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Giving the music claimant 100% is what stopped the music industry from suing YouTube into shutting down. Because the law is old and sides with the music industry so much, YouTube needed a compromise that they'd accept, otherwise we wouldn't even have YouTube.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.