.@BryanLunduke And their twitter profile claims they "coined the term", though an article on the site (https://opensource.org/node/942 ) acknowledges that the term was already in use since at least 1996. OSI is another tool for corporate takeover of Open Source, same as @linuxfoundation.
-
-
Corporate takeover by
@OpenSourceOrg? That's pretty harsh. While LF annual revenue is around $60,000,000, OSI is a volunteer-run community of#OpenSource peers and elected officers with annual revenue of ... $151,000.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @downey
.
@downey@BryanLunduke@linuxfoundation@OpenSourceOrg OK, so why is@OpenSourceOrg using FUD to attempt to control use of the term "Open Source" when it doesn't seem to own a trademark for the term, and why is it claiming to have "coined" the term, though it didn't really?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @GaltsLab @BryanLunduke and
Seems like a history lesson is in order:https://www.engadget.com/2018/02/03/20-years-of-open-source-software/ …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
.@downey @BryanLunduke @linuxfoundation That's BS propaganda by @OpenSourceOrg to try to claim credit for "coining" the term Open Source, though an article on the OSI site itself admits that the term was already in use as early as 1996 if not earlier. https://opensource.org/node/942
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.