Aye, that’s fair; I don’t know the exact details of this situation, so for all I know you’re right, I’ve just seen a lot of people get taken off for no reason and the excuse of it being a private company irks me to an extent, if that company claims to be fair and unbiased
Correct. So why are you using "hate" as a justification for banning people if no one person can provide a true definition of the word?
-
-
Because language doesn't work that way. Words mean different things to different people in different contexts, and you don't need the "one true" definition of a word. Nobody can provide one true definition of "pedophilia" but we still ban that off most places on the internet.
-
Bad analogy imo. the word "Pedophillia" is universally accepted on cyber space to mean attraction to a "minor" (ie. someone who is under 18). Believe me bud, this is not a new argument; the debate about the definition of "hate" speech and censorship goes way back...
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.