This is really just a slander against those mentioned by @gorskon . Rather despicable.
He finishes by confirming their argument.
"There is no COVID-19 “casedemic.” The pandemic is real and deadly."
https://sciencebasedmedicine.org/no-covid-19-casedemic/ …
@FatEmperor @mercola
-
-
You can't get a false positive by failing to collect enough sample. PCR is qualitative not quantitative.
-
Yes you can if you run enough cycles. If you can't detect anything until you've got up to 40 replication cycles the chances are you're copying such a miniscule piece of genetic material that it could be anything.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
Errors in collecting samples (such as not getting far enough back in the nasopharynx or swabbing for long enough) are *far* more likely to result in false negatives, not false positives. As for nosocomial infections, WTF?
-
Galileo’s Mum, you broke my rolling eyeballs GIF with that tweet. We’re overjoyed to welcome you to the Annals of Medical Disinformation, Foolishness, and Conflation. Congratulations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
PCR testing needs to be done by rocket scientists lol? And that statement about ‘nosocomial infections’ is nonsense!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
- Show replies
-
-
-
The training required is not onerous. Nonetheless, those collecting the samples are far more likely to MISS collecting from the required infected spots in the nasopharynx. That would mean that false NEGATIVES would occur bc the swab was nowhere the infected tissue.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.