Nope. It wouldn’t have even made it to market, imo. Sexism is alive and well
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I really hope so.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The words Mary Sue would’ve been thrown around a lot, that’s for sure!
-
I started typing a parody tweet of how this would go down three different times, but I annoyed myself too much to finish.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Idk if Rowling understands women enough to write one as a lead tbh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I want to think it would, but I’m not sure it ever would have gotten the initial marketing push.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably not, but I would have enjoyed it more.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Considering how "revolutionary" a character like Hermione was at the time already. I sincerely doubt it. If she was "too much" as a secondary character, a female main character... Yeah.
-
revolutionary? really?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Harriet the Spy wasn't (although that's a great book) and Mildred Hubble (The Worst Witch) was doing Hogwarts twenty years before Potter.
-
I was going to say this. A lot of shows about young female witches weren't that successful but none of them had WW2 allegories in them.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.