You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
In the end, buying a live-service game is making a bet for the future and supporting a game that's destined to grow and evolve depending on the way its community "consumes" it. And part of that deal is accepting its youth flaws, helping devs to consolidate, improve it.
I agree with that idea. But, it's also important to know what are the qualities and flaws of one of these games at day one. It's, after all, the day one. Even if it will eventually change or be improved... Or eventually not. Reviews remain important.
But we also need to follow the changes of one game. No Man's Sky is a great example. Two years later, many reviewers updated their reviews.
Yeah, and that's a good thing. I'm really hoping for new kinds, new formats of reviews which leave away the old, conventional rating system. People care simply too much about rates more than the review itself. It's time to propose something fresh, something new.
Yes, absolutely, they keep a form of interest for many players, but they should maybe adopt a different format, rethink the notion of rating these games (and games in general if you ask me). I wish big medias were the ones pushing those ideas, reconsidering their way of doing.
Yes, there is maybe something to do in that area. But I don't see a wonderful solution right know. Even without considering the fact that publishers need reviews and sometimes pressure the médias about those...
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
