Please read this paper as it deserves full attention.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The latter conclusion does not follow. RaTG13 was collected from Yunnan, another sample could have been collected as well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My argument is always this: Let's say hypothetically China was creating covid19 in a lab, why exactly then would they release it into their own country and more than that, why on mainland China? That makes absolutely no sense. And of course you've got good evidence too.
-
Just like why would the US drop an atomic bomb in North Carolina? Oh wait it did happen in 1961.
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
I think a lot of the debate is around the furin protease site that is in SARS-CoV-2, and how that is not in the other viruses in the lineage. This paper mostly focuses on the RBD aspects.
-
Yes they do. However they scanned the entire genome including the Furin protease site (Fig 1 and Fig 4,c,d) .
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@Noams_Ark אתה מבין בזה משהו? -
קצת, זה מחקר נוסף שמנסה להעריך מתי נגיף קורונה החדש והנגיף הכי קרוב לו, RaTG13, התפצלו. לפי חישובים שונים אפשר להגיע ללפני 20 שנה או אפילו לפני 80. אבל בתיאוריה יכול להיות נגיף עטלפים קרוב יותר שאנחנו לא מכירים. יש הרבה נגיפים דמויי SARS ורובם עוד לא התגלו
- Show replies
New conversation -
-
-
@GoldenTalon77 please give this due consideration.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.