Fallacy 2: "The accused person has volunteered, donated, or otherwise helped people in noble ways, therefore these charges must be baseless" This generalizes the previous fallacy. Evidence of good deeds or good intentions is not evidence of the absence of harm (2/4)
-
-
Prikaži ovu nit
-
Fallacy 3: "You can't claim to promote tolerance while excluding people like the accused" This is addressed by the "Paradox of Tolerance": https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paradox_of_tolerance … (3/4)
Prikaži ovu nit -
Fallacy 4: "We can overlook people's political views and communities. All that matters are their technical contributions" This is the modern day version of: "Once the rockets are up, who cares where they come down?" The communities we build around technology matter (4/4)
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
How inclusive is the moniker "people like John De Goes"? Obviously his family and friends, but does it extend to people who shared a keynote with him at Scala World? Should I be packing my suitcases for the long trip to Siberia?pic.twitter.com/pt6EBIA8Rc
-
This is fallacy 3: conflating intolerance of intolerance with general intolerance
- Još 2 druga odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank you for posting this.

-
You're welcome!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Thank you so much for posting this

-
You're welcome!
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
This is covered by the third point: the paradox of intolerance. Tolerating intolerant views undermines tolerance
- Još 13 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.