U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
it's been on my list to watch Suely Rolnik's 2016 talk, "The Micropolitics of Thinking: Suggestions to those who seek to deprogram the colonial unconscious" finally got around to it, and wow, see below for some quotes worth returning to...https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yASMCTAHiVM&feature=emb_logo …
here she quotes Guattari as a way of denaturalizing art, recovering it as the act of differentiation, the transformation of the real. desire fuels this process, in seeking new equilibriums we diffract. creativity as the most basic technology.pic.twitter.com/LMDFVoEa87
"Desire is trying to invent, through its act, something that will be bigger than experience. There is a performativity of this experience—in what will be created. This creation can be an artwork, but it can be another way of living sexuality" [sic]
"the problem is that this capacity in Westernized society has been confined in a zone called, since the 80s, art" - she then refers to this as a kind of anthropological/cultural/semiotic "concentration camp"
this is an interesting metaphor because 1) it takes the gallery/museum/"contemporary art" as the institutionalized ghettoization of creativity (which Rolnik refers to as the "essence of life")
and 2) it seems to deepen Althusser's/Foucault's understanding of the cultural institution as not only a disciplinary apparatus but also as a radical foreclosure of ideological (even material) mutation/resistance/escape in that it literally quarantines creativity
this "concentration camp of...the power of creation and differentiation...[becomes] under cognitive capitalism...a kind of extermination camp because even there there is an operation of pimping this potential." (apologies for the bad transcribing)
she argues that this "extermination" is at the heart of modernity: "the most important and successful micropolitical operation of [modern] culture is the anesthesia of what I call a knowing-body, the anesthesia of this capacity to be affected by the world as a field of forces"
in other words, there is an "obstruction of our access to sensation, to this tension," which we would otherwise use "to affirm the ethical, political, and cultural function of thought. thought becomes totally submissive."
she uses this obstruction to define the "reactive micropolitics" of modernity (although i find "anthropophalogocentric" to be quite ridiculous), which she contrasts with an "active micropolitics"pic.twitter.com/aaOnC2kjqh
by a disconnected reproduction of the same (homogenetic) the reactive frame becomes entrenched, numbing itself to its own political agency; whereas the active framework, with its capacity for differentiation (heterogenetic), continually renews this critical consciousness
importantly, "these active or reactive micropolitics are not a privileged of a geographic place." in other words, these frames are not meant to reify any orientalist taxonomy (first/third world) but are instead indicative of coloniality as a complex and pervasive phenomenon
rolnik's proposal: "a permanent decolonisation of the unconscious and its creative irruptions"pic.twitter.com/OLrZ2RSq3A
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
