Motives are so much more accurate at assessing a situation than just believing one report or another. Do you disagree with their motives? (I'm really trying to understand where we diverge, because it seemed we had similar vies on so many issues)
I find it hard to believe, given the scope of the project outlined in the documents, that US intelligence or Iraqi intelligence or any other intelligence service would not have picked something up.
-
-
yes, I know you find it hard to believe - its called evidence and it's dismissal is confirmation bias. So you see that "burden of proof" is not some objective thing, and you actually choose what to accept based on past experience.
-
The documents are not evidence of anything. If they were they would have convinvinced people. Fact is, they didn't even convince Trump's good friend Mike Pompeo. That should give you pause for thought.
- 32 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.