I'm all for it *in theory*. Surely, if we could achieve it without cost, it would be better to eliminate the tyrants of this world and spread rationality and human rights?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I was talking about in theory. The objection you raise is precisely why theory can't translate to practice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This book https://www.nonviolent-conflict.org/resource/why-civil-resistance-works-the-strategic-logic-of-nonviolent-conflict-book-2/ … presented an argument that non-violent toppling requires tools and skills that help build a more resilient society afterwards
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
You can bring a horse to water but you can't make it drink. As simple as that. :/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
If you want to topple a tyrant you must replace him with an agent that will attempt to install a democracy, by fuelling an internal struggle, feeding it, and spreading of propaganda. Special forces do this.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.