“How can you be sure that allowing anyone to live is worth the attendent responsibilities though? Surely the crime rates, amount of suffering in the world, and general environmental cost suggest it is not”...
I'd be interested to know what level of weapon you would draw the line at people being allowed to own, and your reasoning for this.
-
-
This line of inquiry is fallacious. It’s not a univariate equation dependent upon weapon lethality. I’m not going to engage a line of reasoning artificially constructed to stack the deck. What word constitutes hate speech?
-
It's a valid question because we're talking about policy here. I am simply asking you to be more specific about the kind of policy you would favour.
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
