No, and I suppose this response functions as a dodge to avoid making the concession that one of your listed "suspect arguments" has been addressed by JBP ad nauseam.
What Peterson really believes, I suspect, varies depending on who he is trying to antagonise. He strikes me as a typical contrarian, a chameleon that changes colours to violently clash with his surroundings, for no other reason than to stand out.
-
-
Thanks for pointing me to the Harris-Peterson cast. That was awesome. Maybe the best discrete media I've consumed in a year. I feel like their disconnect was pretty obvious, bit I haven't listened to the part 2 yet.
-
Sounded like they just needed to break "truth" into "big truth" and "little truth". Harris wants the one word to mean little for convenience and Peterson wants the one word to mean big for survival.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.