No, and I suppose this response functions as a dodge to avoid making the concession that one of your listed "suspect arguments" has been addressed by JBP ad nauseam.
If all truths are relative, how does he know he's picked the right one? What criteria is he using? Utility? If so, how does he know his truth is most useful, if all knowledge is relative? You see how this creates an infinite regress?
-
-
What Peterson really believes, I suspect, varies depending on who he is trying to antagonise. He strikes me as a typical contrarian, a chameleon that changes colours to violently clash with his surroundings, for no other reason than to stand out.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.