I think many who support Peterson have a problem with his more suspect arguments, but they overlook them because they see Peterson, for now at least, as a welcome saboteur of the orthodoxy that they so despise. When the orthodoxy is defeated, *then* they will consider the rest.
Science and mythology are completely different domains, with different rules and purposes, and conflating the two defeats the point of either.
-
-
From what I’ve seen he’s quite careful to keep both technically seperate, but he draws on both and see’s connections and useful overlapping lessons. One or both of you ought to invite him to do a video-web debate, I’m sure he would happily oblige.
-
I doubt it. I'm not popular enough. But his debate with Sam Harris gave me a thorough understanding of his approach to defending his positions.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All science no philosophy makes Jack hide in a steam tunnel.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XPEWBEa8pqg …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.