I think many who support Peterson have a problem with his more suspect arguments, but they overlook them because they see Peterson, for now at least, as a welcome saboteur of the orthodoxy that they so despise. When the orthodoxy is defeated, *then* they will consider the rest.
-
-
I have yet to see Peterson say anything he can't support. Are you sure there's no foundation for those ideas?
-
Not that I'm aware of. But I like surprises!
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.