I was just making the point that gender is no barrier to wild success on Twitter. The apex examples do not need to be representative to demonstrate that.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You're right, he wasn't thinking of wild success. He was thinking of women being heard. I used wild success to show that women are indeed being heard. (If I'm wrong, he should provide evidence; I'd be more than happy to join his campaign if women are not in fact being heard).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Can you provide evidence that non-successful women are being ignored more than non-successful men?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there any reason to suppose that a gender disparity among famous people would be wildly different to one among non-famous people?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I doubt it. The overwhelming majority of attractive women are not famous or even popular, and those who are famous are not necessarily attractive. The correlation is extremely vague at best.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Problem of induction notwithstanding, it is logical to assume that they are, until proven otherwise.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s like women tend to be somewhat better at social tasks… but saying that would require recognizing that men and women have differences on average and you’ll get fired from Google
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yep ... puerile, condescending virtue signalling. No woman I know (they are all very capable) would want this in a million years.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.