That's not the point. It's possible that sex is so dangerous that it has to be encapsulated within a socially-sanctioned construct.https://twitter.com/primalpoly/status/929179212631629824 …
-
-
Replying to @jordanbpeterson
Marriage is no defense against sexual abuse. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marital_rape …
1 reply 0 retweets 9 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @jordanbpeterson
That's a specific subset of issues.It appears to me that JP is saying that we perhaps need to re-examine how we think about how an overly sexualized society produces unwanted outcomes,in thinking, behaviour, interactions and in(otherwise unlikely)situations that become normalized
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @LuciSatanson @jordanbpeterson
He, and you, are implying that there is more sexual abuse (per capita) now than there was in the past. There is no evidence of this at all.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @jordanbpeterson
He's not, I'm not. You're imagining that. I actually grew up in a shitstorm parenting situation. Do you actually think it's because of higher rates of marriage in the past that sexual abuse was higher? Or are you capable of mustering something more substantive than that nonsense?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
JP spoke of marriage as if it was a defense against sexual abuse. You said "unwanted outcomes ... become normalized," implying that they were once not normalized, as if some institution in the past made sexual abuse wrong in a way that it now isn't.
-
Show additional replies, including those that may contain offensive content
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.