Except idealism, pre-Cartesianism, Wittgensteinian theology, &c. See where I'm going? Naïve Cartesianism is not current: low-hanging fruit.
Dawkins attacked dualism because it is by far the most common philosophy underpinning religion. By doing so he wasn't really caricaturing religion. One could just as easily find irrationality in Berkeley's Christianity as Williams' but at that moment Dawkins was debating Williams
-
-
Watch the debate, I'd say its apparent that he failed to land a hit on Williams, the mainstream CofE or even contemporary Christian theology
-
I watched it, though it was a while ago. I actually think Dawkins won the debate, and would have won even if he'd said nothing, because the burden of proof rests on the one making the claims, and Williams was the one making the claims.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
Anglicanism is not a theology, but a denomination. Berkeley was an Anglican.