And this itself is open to gov discretion. Hence, a gov can carry out an extrajudicial killing of any of its citizens, and if it claims self-defence, it can essentially get away with it.
I've just posted three articles, from the Telegraph, Guardian and BBC, which dispute your claims, and you still won't accept that you're oversimplifying things. I'm done here.
-
-
Because I'm not. You ARE certainly free to argue that these circumstances are somehow DIFFERENT than all that precedent. And I'll keep 1/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
...arguing why it's NOT. If a competent legal jurisdiction ever sides with you, the law will have changed. Til then, we are acting within it
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I, too, have a day to get back to, though. I think we managed to keep it more-or-less within the bounds of civility, so I'll see you around!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.