Interesting study from 2012 found that people with deeper voices are more likely to be perceived as leaders. Vocal pitch could play a significant role in electoral outcomes, and may be one reason women are less likely to obtain leadership roles in society. http://rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/279/1738/2698 …
-
-
Clearly, a preference for deeper voices gives men a distinct advantage over women in elections (and life generally). Perhaps from now on election candidates should use voice synthesizers in debates? Or, less ludicrously, perhaps we could make everyone aware of this inherent bias?
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think there's a lot of complicated shit going on here. I mean, there is the suggestion that masculine = innately linked to leadership but
-
This doesn't always seem to hold. I think there's much to dissect still.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.