Gun deaths won't convince NRA-types of need for gun control, for they consider gun deaths an acceptable cost of 2nd amend. Better to show 2nd amend is obsolete, with 2 arguments - US govt is not hostile to its citizens. - If it was hostile to its citizens, guns wouldn't stop it.
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
Prepper Paradox. In armed revolution, it's your neighbors who will be the immediate danger. Trust in gov to help, in time, like Vegas?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bc_nbc
If there were no civilian firearms, there'd probably be no need for such help in the first place.
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
How would we convert a person who believes his pals would not hesitate to mob his door with pitchforks to steal his prepper stash?
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bc_nbc @G_S_Bhogal
How? Sorry to be so insistent, but this is the biscuit.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @bc_nbc
Increasing restrictions. Campaign for federal bans on semi-automatic assault rifles, which didn't even exist when the 2nd amend was written. And from there, gradually tighten further.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
5 million AR-style rifle owners. I guess we can hope for next generations to turn them in, if your scenario gets traction.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Absolutely. But in the mean time, there's so much that can be done to reduce mass-shooting deaths - background checks, tighter licensing laws, regulating cost of guns/bullets, banning sales of new semi-automatics, education campaigns, incentivized amnesties, etc.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.