Gun deaths won't convince NRA-types of need for gun control, for they consider gun deaths an acceptable cost of 2nd amend. Better to show 2nd amend is obsolete, with 2 arguments - US govt is not hostile to its citizens. - If it was hostile to its citizens, guns wouldn't stop it.
If there were no civilian firearms, there'd probably be no need for such help in the first place.
-
-
Hahaha! If I didn't have an anus, could I still eat? How many guns just 'got lost on a hunting trip' ?
-
Probably a few. But if the solution to guns is more guns, where do you draw the line? When every man, woman and child has their own personal bazooka?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
How would we convert a person who believes his pals would not hesitate to mob his door with pitchforks to steal his prepper stash?
-
We wouldn't. We would just make sure that that person didn't have the means to consummate his delusions with the mass-murder of his neighbors.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
All it would take is an Internet bomb. Everything shuts down, no phone, no gas, no groceries . . . Happened here, when main cable cut.
-
In such a situation, a gun could be used against you as equally as it could be used in your defense.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.