If you want to know how jihadi extremism infects minds and how we can stop it, read my piece for @AreoMagazinehttps://areomagazine.com/2017/09/04/the-fundamentals-of-fundamentalism/ …
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @AreoMagazine
I agree w most of your analysis, but why exactly is it wrong to argue Islam is inherently violent? It can't be b/c many Muslims are peaceful
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewGripp @AreoMagazine
Islam has no inherent nature. It is defined by interpretation, and can therefore be pretty much what we want it to be.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @AreoMagazine
Not all interpretations are equal, are they? Aren't they more or less valid? Otherwise we have postmodernism w the random play of signifiers
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @AndrewGripp @AreoMagazine
There is no accurate way to measure the validity of an interpretation, because they all refer to something that isn't factually true.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @AreoMagazine
Christianity is false, but that doesn't mean that all interpretations are equally valid. Christ was more pacifist than secular warrior-king.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AndrewGripp @AreoMagazine
Valid according to which metric tho? How do you define validity in this context?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @AreoMagazine
Validity based on the content of the (allegedly) divinely revealed or inspired texts.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
We're going round in circles. I have already addressed this. I don't think there's anything further to add.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.