They're mocking the thought process as making no sense, yet it's the same "logic" they use when wanting the government to ban "hate speech." https://twitter.com/FeihcsiimNot/status/904679108667432960 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.Show this thread
-
Yet it's obvious that the "terrorism" distinction is predicated on participation in violence, but "hate speech" actually has no definition.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
It's almost like they copy the logical form of our arguments for their own purposes but apply them inappropriately. But that would be silly.
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread
Replying to @M_Methuselah
Seems like a logical extension of postmodernism: words and their definitions are social constructs, so they can be what you want them to be.
9:35 AM - 4 Sep 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.