No, I've actually studied it as an intelligence professional. Like I said in another reply, as professionals, they follow the facts, and 1/
-
-
Replying to @EINS_Institute @trudyferrer
Your argument is self-defeating. These professionals you speak of themselves admit there is a liberal bias in MSM. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/01/27/dear-mainstream-media-why-so-liberal/?utm_term=.51ab2fbd5152 …
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @trudyferrer
Those who do are wrong. But mainly their argument is what I've just explained. Their CONCLUSIONS lean Left, because that's the direction 1/
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EINS_Institute @trudyferrer
Isn't that moving the goalposts tho? The journos are expert professionals, but only if they agree with you?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @trudyferrer
Nope--only if they agree with THE EVIDENCE--which they do. By and large you're misrepresenting what they're "agreeing" to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @trudyferrer
The evidence on the issues we've been discussing. Basically just saying what the articles you linked were--more nuanced than you portrayed.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @EINS_Institute @trudyferrer
I actually think that all truth is more nuanced than left-right politics. Hence my problem with your assertion that facts lean left.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
The left may well be a more desirable position ethically, but it has no more claim to the truth than any other partisan position.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @trudyferrer
But we're going in circles here--and like I said, I do have a life to get back to. LOL Great discussion, though; thanks to you both!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Yeah, it's been emotional. Have a good weekend guys!
-
New conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.