Again--what's your evidence? I think that's an open question. I just think there are moral/ethical reasons we don't want to go that far....
Your argument is self-defeating. These professionals you speak of themselves admit there is a liberal bias in MSM. https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2017/01/27/dear-mainstream-media-why-so-liberal/?utm_term=.51ab2fbd5152 …
-
-
Those who do are wrong. But mainly their argument is what I've just explained. Their CONCLUSIONS lean Left, because that's the direction 1/
-
Isn't that moving the goalposts tho? The journos are expert professionals, but only if they agree with you?
- 10 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
...being decisively defeated in the public arena. 3/3
-
If you can send me links of the far-right being decisively defeated in debate, I'd appreciate it.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
...that the evidence points. And getting back to our original theme, that's why the bigots & far-right had 50 years of their arguments 2/
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.