That's what my original tweet was about.
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
The text of your original tweet is about sexism being women's problem to deal with, not men's.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AmericanTeethSM
The context was the Google memo. And it's not simply about sexism; but about enduring the inevitable (i.e. nastiness from other people).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
If you insist on only talking in general terms no specific action seems right. It's a neat trick but not an argument.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AmericanTeethSM
Nope. Not in general terms. My argument is very specific. Curbing opinions you don't like isn't an effective way to narrow gender disparity.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @AmericanTeethSM
For reference look at every attempt to curb free expression in history and what it led to.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
I'd say outlawing white only signs went pretty well.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @AmericanTeethSM
False equivalence. We're not talking about "men only" signs. We're talking about one guy pointing out evo psych findings.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
Which you've already agreed constitutes "nastiness," although "nastiness" which we'd be "mollycoddling" to shield people from.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
By nastiness I meant "opinions/facts you may not like". Twitter's only 140 characters, not conducive to nuance.
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
Falsehoods for one. You seem heavily impressed by a couple papers cited against the broad consensus of the whole of social science.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.