I'm happy to continue the debate with you, but please, let's not be rude to each other.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Livi_We_Trust @ScientistMel
neither I nor Google guy claimed there were sure differences. the claim was that there are differences *on average*.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Replying to @Livi_We_Trust @ScientistMel
I agree, a lot of our behaviour is sociological. But not all. For instance, *on average*, women's moods can be affected by menstrual cycles.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
I would recommend the work of
@sentientist. Unlike us three, she is perfectly qualified to speak with authority on these matters.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Diana S. Fleischman Retweeted
@livi_we_trust is not a great admirer of my expertise :) It's Dr, btw https://twitter.com/Livi_We_Trust/status/854189218310103040 …Diana S. Fleischman added,
This Tweet is unavailable.1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
I've been debating these two a while. They and their friends were generally unable to provide counterarguments other than "I'm offended!"
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @sentientist and
One of them, a self-proclaimed science expert, ignored a meta-analysis that proved her wrong and then muted me.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @sentientist and
The other,
@livi_we_trust, was at least able to keep it civil. But maintained that all gender disparities are sociological, not biological.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Even though the most recent studies fly in the face of this: https://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/games-primates-play/201201/gender-differences-in-personality-are-larger-previously-thought …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.