As with everything, people are outraged about that Google memo, while offering no rebuttals to it. Being offended is not a counterargument.
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @yonatanzunger
Moralising obfuscation/lies, right from the off.pic.twitter.com/LfxCaT5jmk
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
This _exact_ construction so often seems a unique shame of the left: 2nd-guessing an interpretation of a perceived wrongthinker's position.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
And this, sadly, is universal: not only is the dissenter _factually_ wrong, he's _morally_ wrong too. This is othering. This is tribalism.pic.twitter.com/Sq1shouVlZ
1 reply 1 retweet 2 likes -
What does "making it possible" mean?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Vastly different things to different people, it seems.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Basically just one big hysterical dominance move to crush this mild dissenter & gain more status from his in-group
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Exactly. And a somewhat ironic power-grab too, given the memo's mention of an evolved male slant towards status and competitiveness. Ha!
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
A great reason to teach more evolutionary psychology in school. It really connects the dots and gives context to these sorts of things.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Hmm... I agree, but how to get it past the so-called 'progressives'/bring them on-board? Evo psych teaches a lot of leftist blasphemy!
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I think we've just got to be rational, and hope that strong arguments will suffice. Anything else, and we risk sacrificing truth for power.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.