no,it's not."Disrespecting" people by talking about an idea they hold dear,is not worse than disrespecting people by eating them
-
-
Replying to @MaajidNawaz
I'm not saying either is worse. I'm saying it's a category error. The two cannot logically be compared.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
yes they can, if the issue being compared is acting un-PC whole offending people.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz
Reza's point was that Sam equated Islam with Wahhabism, thereby exacerbating "islamophobia", whereas Cannibalism is just yuck.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @MaajidNawaz
Not that I agree with Reza, mind. I'm a big fan of Sam.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @MaajidNawaz
One way Reza IS a hypocrite is in equating Hindus with Aghori, by selectively focusing on them as Sam "focuses" on Wahhabism
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
a) Sam doesn't think islam is wahhabism. b) Sam takes issue with all forms of Islam, and all forms of religion
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz @G_S_Bhogal
c) censuring ppl talking on Islam from fear of offending ppl, while u eat human without worrying abt offending ppl,is hypocrisy
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz @G_S_Bhogal
d) censuring ppl talking on Islam due to anti-Muslims, but depicting Hindus as cannibals without worrying abt same, is hypocrisy
2 replies 2 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @MaajidNawaz @G_S_Bhogal
e) not worrying abt anti-Hindu backlash by appealing to freedom to report&nuance of depiction,while censuring Sam,is hypocrisy
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.