Main argument? “the dominant view among evolutionary psychologists”, what else. Religion as a byproduct of evolution, not even adaptation. Atheist & sceptic became oxymoron. An atheist sceptic, once again, w/ blind conformity to a “dominant view”, without a shred of scepticism.https://twitter.com/G_S_Bhogal/status/1255137386205376518 …
I'm not responsible for those big blocks of capitals, the editor is. And as you point out, I go on to argue that *even if* the dominant view is wrong, Taleb and Peterson's argument makes no sense.
-
-
Now, w/ a screenshot suddenly I "remember correctly"... but it wasn't your fault. For heavens shake, you cherry picked this phrase that I quote. And without it, still, main argument is this evol claim (principle), and then go downwards on "even ifs" (to reinforce the principle)
-
My brain shut down and stopped reading when I saw the kind of study he relied upon.pic.twitter.com/7GYAfhEGup
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.