Main argument? “the dominant view among evolutionary psychologists”, what else. Religion as a byproduct of evolution, not even adaptation. Atheist & sceptic became oxymoron. An atheist sceptic, once again, w/ blind conformity to a “dominant view”, without a shred of scepticism.https://twitter.com/G_S_Bhogal/status/1255137386205376518 …
-
-
The article has two quotes, in capital. This is one of them. On the "DOMINANT VIEW AMONG THE EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGISTS". You build up from there, and then go down to the fringe, the fringe of the fringe with "even if" narrative. The principle in caps & the "even if" exceptions.pic.twitter.com/Zpqctp9cWJ
-
I'm not responsible for those big blocks of capitals, the editor is. And as you point out, I go on to argue that *even if* the dominant view is wrong, Taleb and Peterson's argument makes no sense.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.