You can usually predict someone’s stance on almost any issue if you know their broad political position. This suggests that people are habitually determining their opinions from their tribes.
-
-
Probably a core stance on the right of the individual ala Noycek.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Someone just (in the last few days) tweeted research showing that social and fiscal conservatism are not correlated in other regions. (Let me see if I can find it …).
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Probably the respect for individual liberty and personal responsibility.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How well are they linked though? There might be some correlation, but that's not evidence for causation
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Muslims vote left-wing more than any other group. Also they are very socially conservative. Also, your theory falls apart with Westboro baptists and Richard Spencer and Armour.
-
*sarsour.. Damn autocorrect
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Non-aggressive individualism would lead to this if you believe in the personhood of a foetus. The latter is a nuanced enough debate that you get free-marketers take up varying positions on it though.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
To be fair there are lots of people who are anti capitalist and anti abortion; and visversa.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Maybe because both stem from the ideals of some combination of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.