Unfortunately, anyone who is not taken in by the emotional heft of the narrative and accompanying music, and who actually delves into some of the claims made, will quickly notice serious inconsistencies in the testimonies of the accusers and their families. For instance:
-
Show this thread
-
1) Robson claims in the film that he and his co-accuser Safechuck never met each other as adults. This is false. In a 2016 deposition, it was confirmed that they met in 2014, and that they even have the same attorneys.pic.twitter.com/YYzD7iDb6l
4 replies 68 retweets 271 likesShow this thread -
Gurindoor Retweeted Justice for The Falsely Accused
2) And yet, their accounts often contradict each other. Safechuck continually portrays MJ as paranoid, secretive, and ultra-cautious in his abuse, while Robson continually portrays MJ as wild, reckless and brazen in his abuse. Read more here:https://twitter.com/JuliaBerkowitz1/status/1084054102462615552 …
Gurindoor added,
1 reply 49 retweets 210 likesShow this thread -
3) When Robson and Safechuck’s claims do match, they are often similar to those described in “Michael Jackson Was My Lover”, by Victor Gutierrez, which was resoundingly debunked in court as the erotic fiction of a fantasist and child rape apologist.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qb5UVMwTC5g …
1 reply 49 retweets 189 likesShow this thread -
Gurindoor Retweeted Justice for The Falsely Accused
4) Robson claims that MJ arranged for Robson’s migration to the US for the “explicit purpose” of sexually abusing him. This is contradicted by the claim that Robson’s parents asked MJ to sponsor Robson so they could migrate.https://twitter.com/JuliaBerkowitz1/status/1084406028341559296 …
Gurindoor added,
Justice for The Falsely Accused @JuliaBerkowitz1The role of MJ's companies in all this was that when Joy eventually decided to immigrate in September 1991, the Robsons needed a sponsor and an employer in the USA to be able to stay. Joy asked MJ to help them with that, and MJ instructed his office to do it. pic.twitter.com/nm4ekhaHdHShow this thread1 reply 50 retweets 167 likesShow this thread -
5) "Oh thank god, he can't hurt any more children. Those were my thoughts, and I danced. I was so happy he died." This is what Safechuck's mother claims she said on hearing of MJ's death. The problem is, MJ died in 2009, 4 years before her son “realised” he’d been abused.
9 replies 77 retweets 296 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
Try at least to make an attempt to be factually accurate. It’s clearly stated in the doc Safechuck told his Mother in 2005, hence why she and he didn’t testify. If you’re trying to defend a child molester do try and do so accurately.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @cristo_radio
Safechuck also claimed he didn't realise he'd been abused until 2013. I know this contradicts the narrative you've gullibly swallowed from the tabloids you get your info from, but that doesn't mean it's not true.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
But he told his mother Michael Jackson was a ‘bad man’ in 2005 in the context of the Gavin Arvizo case. Hence why she celebrated MJ’s death in 2009. Then Wade Robson went public in 2013 meaning Safechuck felt able to elaborate. All this is clearly in the documentary
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @cristo_radio
His mother also remarks that when James finally broke the news to her in 2013, she was furious with him for not telling her about the abuse earlier. Explain that.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
And don't say she knew MJ was a paedo but didn't realise that MJ had abused James; if your son had been alone with someone believed to be a child molester, and he'd then told you that this person was evil, would you not want to ask more questions? Would you not fear for your son?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.