If you can’t see that Michael Jackson was a paedophile after watching @danreed1000 ‘s film you are being wilfully blind. And if you are campaigning against it you are actively colluding in the silencing of victims.
-
-
Replying to @louistheroux @danreed1000
This is the first time I've ever disagreed with you Louis. Why wait until now, after every other avenue to fame and fortune has already expired? Why remain so close to the Jackson name and family all these years and suddenly remember everything when a cheque was dangled?
77 replies 46 retweets 1,149 likes -
If you watch the documentary that question is answered. When a child is that little, and is that badly damaged, this is how long it takes to unravel the effects of abuse, and then find the strength to come forward.
2 replies 0 retweets 7 likes -
well maybe. or maybe it’s just about that hundred million dollar court case thay have against the MJ estate. just follow the money.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @kubathedude @ptenbob and
It's the MJ Estate that is suing for $100m, not the sex abuse victims.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @J053PH_ @kubathedude and
That's false. Robson and Safechuck have filed a $1.5 billion creditor's claim along with their civil lawsuit.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @kubathedude and
No it's not. MJE is currently suing HBO for $100m. The claim you refer to is from 2017 and was dismissed. Ergo there's no likelihood of the victims benefiting from legal compensation as a result of telling their stories.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
They are in the middle of an appeal.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.