And by his own admission, his memory “evolved” after shopping a book around
-
-
Replying to @samsamdesigns @Grafne
That was Robson. But yes, Safechuck also implied that his memory had "evolved" after seeing Robson.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
His feelings about the abuse had evolved over time, not his memory of it. Are you sure you watched both parts of this film in full? It feels like you’re giving me rote responses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @samsamdesigns
He claimed his memories had evolved in his 2016 deposition. Unlike you, I have actually studied more than just the documentary (though even this I have watched more closely than you appear to have).
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
Link to his 2016 deposition? I find it hard to believe you watched it very closely when you still think it's an inconsistency that James' mother was happy when MJ died.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @samsamdesigns
Nope, I'm not going to waste any more time on you. You honestly expect me to dig through pages and pages of legal papers just so you can dismiss it all with another one of your excuses? If you really care about the truth, use Google to find what you're looking for.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
Is this what you're talking about? This is from 2015 not 2016 but I can't find anything else. https://www.mjfacts.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/031814-suppl-decl-Safechuck-wm.pdf … I can't find anything that contradicts what he said in the film.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @samsamdesigns
I was talking about Robson, who literally said his memory had evolved in his 2016 deposition. I said for Safechuck, he *implied* his memory had evolved; he didn't actually say it.
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
Why were you talking about Robson when I was always talking about Safechuck? You're being deliberately confusing. So I'll ask again: How is it an inconsistency that his mother was happy when MJ died in 2009?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @samsamdesigns
At the 2003 trial, James claims he simply told her he didn't want to testify in favour of MJ, as he was not a good man. Yet she never thought to ask more questions about this? Surely she would have feared right away that her son had been abused if he knew MJ was not a good man?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
So... she knew he was a child rapist in 2009, based on being told by her son that he was not a good man in 2003? And yet, she did not know that her own son had been a victim until 2015, despite the fact that he had told her MJ was not a good man back in 2003?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.