If they're acting, the likeliest motivation is money.
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
You didn’t answer my question. Having watched both parts of the documentary as you have, do you believe the whole thing was a performance? That both families colluded to act out this fantasy for the camera? Is that the most likely explanation?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
I have to say, your thread reads like it was written by someone who didn’t watch the film very closely. For instance, point 5 is easily explained in part 2 of the film.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
When he refuses to testify in Michael’s defence at the Gavin Arvizo trial he heavily implies to his mother that the allegations about MJ are true but doesn’t go into detail about what happened to him specifically until later in his life. Says something like “MJ is an evil man.”
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @samsamdesigns
So why then does he claim he didn't realise he'd been abused until 2013?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @Grafne
And by his own admission, his memory “evolved” after shopping a book around
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @samsamdesigns @Grafne
That was Robson. But yes, Safechuck also implied that his memory had "evolved" after seeing Robson.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @samsamdesigns
His feelings about the abuse had evolved over time, not his memory of it. Are you sure you watched both parts of this film in full? It feels like you’re giving me rote responses.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
He claimed his memories had evolved in his 2016 deposition. Unlike you, I have actually studied more than just the documentary (though even this I have watched more closely than you appear to have).
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.