Together, the pair filed a $1.5 billion dollar creditor’s claim and civil lawsuit against MJ’s estate. Their case was thrown out of court due to the Statue of Limitations and possible implications of perjury. But Robson & Safechuck can still appeal, and intend to.
-
Show this thread
-
Now, it is possible that Robson’s effusive tributes to MJ, his insistence on being associated with MJ even after death, his grand showbiz aspirations, his sudden epiphany of abuse when penniless aged 30, are the encrypted cries for help of an an abuse survivor.
1 reply 26 retweets 88 likesShow this thread -
It is also possible that watching Robson detail his abuse on TV really did trigger latent memories of abuse in Safechuck, and that the two then decided to collaborate in good faith to innocently seek justice in the form of $1.5 billion by blaming MJ’s estate for MJ’s abuse.
2 replies 21 retweets 77 likesShow this thread -
But, the more I learn about this case, the more room for doubt I find, and I am just not able to explain away the inconsistencies as peremptorily as so many of you have done.
1 reply 25 retweets 133 likesShow this thread -
And even if Robson and Safechuck are telling the truth, then Leaving Neverland, with its tendentious cherry-picking, and its refusal to address suspicious holes in the testimony, from which doubts have sprouted, has utterly failed them, and they deserve better than a shock-doc.
3 replies 24 retweets 120 likesShow this thread -
Whatever the truth, one fact remains: despite all the doubts we should have about the allegations—after Jussie Smollett and Covington—the world has once again uncritically swallowed a victimhood narrative based on mere talk. And that, to me, is wrongdoing I can be certain of.
34 replies 49 retweets 328 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal
Let's say for the sake of argument, that Michael Jackson is totally innocent of the accusations. His behaviour is still really abnormal and creepy. I mean, you can't have prepubescent boys sleeping in your bed almost every day for years and expect to be accused of nothing.
4 replies 0 retweets 6 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @G_S_Bhogal
Even after he narrowly escaped jail, he kept having these sleepovers. And it was always with young boys, not girls. To me it looks like compulsive sexual behaviour. If he really wasn't attracted to these children you'd think he could tone it down on the whole sleepover thing.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Grafne @G_S_Bhogal
Narrowly escaped jail? I don’t think so. In 1993 there wasn’t enough evidence to secure an arrest/indictment let alone trial. In 2005 the defense did not have to call a single witness as the prosecutions case was obliterated. Who said he had sleepovers after 2005?
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @samsamdesigns @G_S_Bhogal
In 1993 MJ rushed to settle the case cause Jordan had very credible evidence against him including accurate descriptions of his penis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
None of that is true, even though it's been widely reported. (Also, bear in mind that Jordan's father was caught on tape talking about how he was going to swindle Jackson for all he was worth days before he alleged the abuse happened.) https://themichaeljacksonallegations.com/2016/12/26/did-jordan-chandlers-description-of-michael-jacksons-penis-match-the-photographs-taken-of-the-stars-genitalia-by-the-police/ …
-
-
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @Grafne
Right and quick to settle? Not quite. By their own admission the Chandlers asked for 1 million dollars which Jackson refused to pay. The settlement was reached after the judge refused to delay the civil proceedings until the criminal investigation was complete.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.