I really don't know what's more (ob)noxious, the fanatical MJ fans who deny reality or the fanatical purists who want to literally destroy art made by bad people. In literal bonfires. W.T.F.https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/03/06/before-you-cancel-michael-jackson-listen-his-music-one-last-time/?utm_term=.48fbc9c36c9e#click=https://t.co/Z1AWgC7UcU …
-
-
Replying to @CathyYoung63
I'd be interested to know why you think Michael Jackson is guilty. I've watched Leaving Neverland, done lots of background reading, and yet, despite my best efforts, I've found no compelling evidence of his guilt.
3 replies 1 retweet 10 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @CathyYoung63
His maid saying the house had boys underwear and Vaseline in various rooms, multiple accusers, multiple trials, multiple payoffs, and the accused man’s obviously aberrant, deeply troubling behavior towards children.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @JefferiesTuber @CathyYoung63
None of that proves anything. Remember, the FBI and LAPD thoroughly investigated it all, and, over a ten year period, was unable to find any proof of anything.
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @G_S_Bhogal @CathyYoung63
This is false: “was unable to find any proof of anything.” The decision to not prosecute is not proof that no evidence of guilt was collected, only that the defense could show reasonable doubt.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
I think you're mixing up the words evidence and proof. http://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=1642 …
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.