You could make a cogent argument for truth advancing liberty, but I can't see the argument that truth advances equality, either of outcome or opportunity.
-
-
-
You can only lift people out of poverty if you are honest about its causes.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This implies you can’t have priorities until you know everything, which is a mistake I think. Plus your priorities inform your perception. There is no freestanding truth, more like overwhelming noise that needs to be filtered. Politics is the proper realm for debating priorities.
-
I don't think it implies that at all. It merely implies that if you want freedom or equality, then you have to be honest with yourself.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
That which is in accordance with reality.
-
Perception of reality is variable...
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
What is 'truth'? What is, what should be or what is most useful to the majority?
-
What is. Without which we wouldn't be able to determine what should be or what is most useful to the majority.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Favor? or just acknowledge? We can not like facts, and work to change them, but only after we accept that they are in fact, facts and truth. I think we can downgrade that favoritism to acceptance.
-
I meant favour the principle of truth, not individual facts.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.