No. Conscientiousness is more likely to select "paper shufflers." And sometimes papers need to be properly shuffled. You're not really denying the existence of psychometric intelligence, are you? What do you propose as a replacement? https://twitter.com/nntaleb/status/1076845397795065856 …
-
-
Can you elaborate on which part is wrong?
-
You can find it in Twitter. Sailer, Murray, and now Peterson have exposed him on this topic
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm not usually a fan of "the dis", but this got a chuckle out of me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
seems more like people having a hard time letting go of the status quo to me...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
guy reads black swan, thinks he's smarter... it has that effect. meh
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If one could choose their child to have an IQ 150 vs 100 (lots of skin in the game here) with everything else equal, there is no chance the former wouldn’t be preferred.
-
Taleb is right. Disproving IQ science is like disproving astrology. "Surely you'd like your son to be a good star sign better than an unlucky one?" Well, suuure.
You have to prove that there's an all encompassing mapping from cognitive capability into a mathematical measure. - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I'm sure your random insult holds more weight than the statistical analysis he posted yesterday
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.