People’s perceptions of this speech are little more than a projection of conclusions they’ve already drawn and narratives they desire to propagate. Despite the bluster—whether one likes it or not—that speech accomplished its goals, and was about as strong a showing as possible.
-
-
-
Your second paragraph appears to be invalidated by your first.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This was no time for normal judicial behavior. He had been accused of everything short of mass murder and was fighting a political survival battle not a calm reasoned approach. Fire with fire time perhaps.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It didn't confirm or refute, but by reference to a best explanation, confidence adjusting methods, etc.. the partisanship, being overly defensive and denying of never having gaps in memory from alcohol (really?) being misleading about Trump, has hurt his credibility in my view.
-
*being misleading about Trump was from his first hearing. But praising Trump today while expressing outrage at potential harm to the court, was pretty bad too.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He's hired then?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He'd be a terrible Uber driver too.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, for a rational, fair judge.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Exactly.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
